We are concluding our Series on "Men WITH Women". Today's post is a continuation of yesterday's post. Yesterday, we covered HOW the traditional church actually encourages spouses to control mates as the solution to telling spouses HOW to be most intimate with their mate.
Basically, the spouse doesn't continually get to know their mate better. The spouse spends their time preventing their mate and others from getting to know each other better. We called this a "Right-Wrong" answer. It is a Right WHAT (be most intimate with your mate) with a Wrong HOW (limit your mate's ability to share with anyone else). Yesterday's post concluded in the following manner:
Instead, the Right-Wrong answer focuses on maintaining...which is believing in a finish line. For example, the husband knows the most about his wife. The husband then spends the majority of his effort preventing anyone else from getting to know his wife…and preventing his wife from getting to know anyone else! This actually encourages the husband to be LESS excellent! It is safe to be LESS excellent.
This is the IS Strategy:
1. Limit spouse’s interaction with people of the opposite sex.
2. Don’t attempt to get to know your spouse better.
3. Focus on requiring EFFECTS (Sex, respect, etc.) from your spouse
4. Continually look outside the marriage (hobbies, vacations, friends, etc.) for energy to continue this strategy.
Is God directing the husband to do this? No! This is a work of the flesh. God is NOT involved in this HOW/WHY at all. However, isn’t this the strategy that pastors and “Christian” authors teach? Again, this is idolatry!
Is the goal for marriages to be Profitable…for spouses to have an unlimited source of energy and spiritual value? OR is the goal to prevent people from making a mistake…for spouses to minimize their Unprofitability?
If the “Right-Right” solution were God’s Will, wouldn’t it be more effective at preventing sexual sin? HOW would the Right-Right solution do this?
Today, we will answer this question with the OUGHT Strategy...
CONTROL OR FREEDOM (PART II)
Here is the OUGHT progression for Marriage...
OUGHT STRATEGY
1. Progress from Interaction to Fellowship.
2. Remain at Fellowship for at least one year without touching
3. Touch as an Effect of sharing more Mentally, Emotionally, and Spiritually
4. Determine if both are mutually progressing to intercourse
5. Share EVERYTHING you are aware of
(This ensures a person is NOT committing idolatry and fornication when they get married because getting married without knowing your spouse intimately Mentally, Emotionally, and Spiritually is actually giving yourself to an image.)
6. Intercourse - Marriage Covenant
Before we continue, let’s identify the traditional stages couples progress through…
Notice, Step #6 is Marriage. That makes Step #4 Engagement! When the couple determines they are going to progress to Marriage, they have made a vow and their engagement period is spent sharing EVERYTHING.
“Dating” would be Steps 1-3. What is the non-contradictory definition of “dating”?
Dating is when two people get to know each other better and the Effect is they are mutually physically attracted to each other. There are two subtle points to this OUGHT Dating definition…
First, the CAUSE is two people getting to know each other better. The EFFECT is they are mutually physically attracted to each other. Unfortunately, our culture flips this…people are first mutually physically attracted to each other (CAUSE) and the EFFECT is that they get to know each other better.
Notice, getting to know each other better as a CAUSE makes the Mental, Emotional, and Spiritual the CAUSE…and the EFFECT is Physical. This is sustainable. There is NO finish line.
Our culture makes the Physical the CAUSE with the expectation that it will result in growth in the Mental, Emotional, and Spiritual. You see this when a male fantasizes about a famous beautiful woman. The thought goes something like this: “If I could be with Miss America (a beautiful woman), then I’d be Mentally, Emotionally, and Spiritually happy.”
One of the reasons marriages in our culture end in divorce is that they are doomed from the beginning…during the dating stage!
Everyone wants the same WHAT: intense emotions and physical attraction to ONE person of the opposite sex. Another way of stating this goal is “Sex with a fantasy mate.” This is a Right WHAT. The Right HOW/WHY is to make this goal an EFFECT. Focus on the Mental, Emotional, and Spiritual aspects so that the EFFECT is the person becomes the MOST Physically attractive person in the world!
However, the Wrong HOW/WHY is to make this goal a CAUSE: To focus on the Physical…to ONLY look for the perfect physical mate (or the one as close as possible to the perfect physical mate). When this is HOW dating is approached, the ONLY way to continually get MORE energy during the “dating” process is to focus on the Physical…to focus on touching. We called this "Groping Sex".
Notice, this OUGHT definition of dating involves “mutually physically attracted to each other”. It is possible to be attracted to people without it being physical. It is also possible to be physically attracted to someone who is not physically attracted to you. These cases don’t result in making touching a CAUSE. However, when two people are mutually physically attracted to each other, how they handle their mutual desire to touch becomes the critical issue.
When touching becomes the CAUSE, this is the definition of IS Dating. The touching will increase until it can’t increase any more (intercourse). Once these Mental, Emotional, and Spiritual bonds have occurred as an EFFECT of the Physical, the relationship is prevented from achieving Profitable because the aspects that could continue to grow indefinitely (Mental, Emotional, and Spiritual) are limited by the one aspect that is unable to grow indefinitely (Physical) and in reality is always going to decline overtime (with age)!
There are two ways to attempt to have Sex with your fantasy mate:
1. Make the Physical a CAUSE (Focus on the appearance of your mate).
2. Make the Physical an EFFECT (Focus on the Mental, Emotional, and Spiritual aspects of your mate).
Which one does the world do? Which one does God want you to do? Which one do you think is the Right HOW/WHY?
The second subtle point to the OUGHT Dating definition is: there are NO expectations in this non-contradictory definition of dating! There is nothing stating this arrangement is exclusive or that either person has control over the other. In fact, this is another reason marriages fail today…
When two people become attracted to each other, they get a high that is indescribable. The CAUSE is that each person knows the other person WANTS to be with them. This results in an exhilarating feeling. So what is our man-made response to this feeling? Try to control it!
We desire to have this feeling, so we attempt to require the other person to keep doing what they had WANTED and CHOSEN to previously do…and the second we put this control and expectation on the attraction, we actually drain the Profitability from the attraction! We now don’t know if the person actually WANTS to be with us or HAS to be with us. The ONLY way to maintain that indescribable high is to not put any expectations or control on each other.
Think about it: the minute these two people view Marriage as an expectation or a source of control, ANY attraction from someone outside the marriage results in a greater feeling than what is experienced within the marriage! That is WHY people commit sexual sin outside of their marriage! The traditional church's Right-Wrong (control) solution actually encourages sexual sin!
How many times have you heard of two people living together for years, only to get divorced shortly after they got married? Is the “fear of commitment” that some people feel ACTUALLY coming from God? Said another way, Is God ACTUALLY telling people NOT to REQUIRE commitment from each other?
What OUGHT to happen?
Tomorrow, we will conclude this Series by answering this question...
Next Post
4 comments:
The six steps you outline are amazing. Have you done this in your relationship? What differences do you see if you follow this path?
HI Dagney,
The posts from this Series are from Modeling God's Wills and the drafts of the third book: Modeling Church.
The information (both IS and OUGHT) is the result of not only my personal experience, but what I have witnessed in others that I've helped (or tried to help) over the past three years.
You asked a great question about differences...
One of the key points that is NOT emphasized during this Series is the value of the ARE. (It is heavily emphasized in Modeling God and Modeling God's Wills.)
The ability to make it through this process doesn't guarantee you will have OUGHT Marriage because it is possible to go through this process with someone who's ARE doesn't perfectly mesh with your own.
The key is to focus on determining who you ARE and learning better who the other person truly is to see if you mesh. THEN, going through this process leads to OUGHT Marriage. This brings up a subtle point...
Finding an ARE that perfectly meshes RESULTS in patience!
I have seen that when two people KNOW their ARE's mesh, they are NOT in a rush to make it through the six steps. They KNOW that they are with someone who is RIGHT for them...and they KNOW they will eventually be together (because the other person is excellent and KNOWS they are perfect for the other person), so they KNOW they don't have to make anything happen (which leads to patience and freedom...which will be discussed tomorrow). They can COMPLETELY focus on getting to know each other better Mentally, Emotionally, and Spiritually.
It is the couples that DON'T KNOW if they mesh that are NOT patient. WHY? Because they need to determine if they are RIGHT for each other or not. They need to find the person who is RIGHT for them. If they are NOT RIGHT for each other, staying together actually makes FOUR lives Unprofitable...theirs and the two people they OUGHT to be with. So, one of the quickest ways to determine if people KNOW their ARE's mesh is if they are patient with this six step process.
Too many people set a timeframe to get married and then choose the "best available" candidate when their deadline arrives. This ACTUALLY hinders getting to know others...AND encourage people NOT to be patient.
The main difference in these two paths will be outlined in tomorrow's post. However, the details behind these six steps are in Modeling God's Wills. The examples from my life and the lives of other's will be in Modeling Church. If you are interested in more of these details, please feel free to contact me via e-mail so I can understand which examples will apply best to you.
Dagney, thank you for posting a great comment! This is a perfect example of WHY I NEED reader's comments. I wouldn't have thought to Share this information now, but it is obviously something other readers are wondering as well.
I owe you,
John
John,
One of the often quoted things about alcohol is that it helps you lose your inhibitions. It seems to me that the basic idea of losing your inhibitions is to take more emotional risks without as much anxiety.
Since you have been addressing dating I've been thinking that alcohol is often involved in dating.
Does the emotional risk still have the same effect if alcohol (in moderation, for arguments sake) or any other anti-anxiety medications are involved?
Clearly the consequence(s) of the risk are still there if nothing else.
Thanks,
Tom
HI Tom,
TYPICAL comment from you...I'm struggling to decide if I need to do a whole post on this point while I'm kicking myself for not even remotely thinking about covering this point. I think you've caused me to have this reaction more than any other person who comments.
I'll go with the overview answer...
You are absolutely correct in your assessment of the role of alcohol in this situation: makes taking an emotional risk easier. The consequences are there, however, the RATIONALIZATION is present.
So, the issue becomes HOW does the person handle the moment once they are sober?
If they try to act like it never happened (whether it goes well or not), then they are doing damage to their brain as well as opening themselves up to physical illness.
Let's say they get an Unexcellent response...if they face this, complete the Second Feedback Loop, and put it into their cortex, then this is very healthy.
If they get an Excellent response...facing this would involve confirming with the person that they meant what they Shared. Hopefully, this would lead to them taking more emotional risks without alcohol.
However, if the person they Shared the information with wants to act like it never happened, then the person who Shared would have to re-evaluate whether the person they Shared with is Excellent or not.
There are A LOT of "tools" that facilitate Sharing. Some of them are "chemical"...some are "emotional" (a person who is dealing with a personal issue)...some are visual (movies can make people vulnerable)...some are audio (songs can make people vulnerable)...
The tool isn't Right or Wrong...it is the response after the tool has been removed that determines the Profitability.
Tom, please continue to comment on this blog. You always seem to make it better.
I owe you,
John
Post a Comment